OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, corporate governance, business continuity, compliance, financial crime
OpRisk & Compliance - Free trial
OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, compliance About Oprisk & Compliance Subscribe to OpRisk & Compliance Advertise on OpRisk & Compliance Contacts at OpRisk & Compliance Free trial to OpRisk & Compliance Help on OpRisk & Compliance
Career Center Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance Career Center
  Job Seekers Sign in / Register Recruiter's Sign-in
TOP STORIES  
 
Are short sellers the spawn of the devil?
17 Jun 2008
Short sellers have proven the scourge of Bradford & Bingley, HBOS, Bear Stearns, Lehman, and any other institution that looks a little ragged around the edges.

Spurred into action by horrid ‘bear raids’ on B&B and HBOS, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has rushed to the rescue with draconian new rules. As of 25 June, short sellers in the UK will have to make public any short position they hold related to 0.25% of a company’s stock (FT).

But short sellers have their advantages. Without the likes of David Einhorn (NY Mag), we might, for example, be none the wiser about the $1.1bn alleged discrepancy in the value of level three assets reported by Lehman in its Q1 call vs. its 10Q filing.

Lehman’s Fuld has berated Einhorn and his proteges. But according to Einhorn, management teams that complain about short sellers are usually trying to distract investors from serious underlying problems with their business.

Do short sellers provide a valuable service, or are their predatory tactics deserving of vitriol and tighter regulation? Go short or long on the practice below.

Related Articles:
Generous redundancy payouts at Lehman?
Dr Dread: Lehman’s hedges won’t be the only ones to blow up
Week in review: Lehman on the brink; rights issues go awry
Related Links:
Guardian: Short selling changes could be first of many
The Times: FSA rules are over the top
Alphaville: Lehman short selling hits a record
Reader Comments
Date: 17 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Short Roger ()
Company:
It's up to David Einhorn if he wants to go short on Lehman Brothers and it's up to UK investors if they want to go short on Bradford and Bingley. If someone things they've made a mistake, it's also up to them to go long on the same stocks. It is not up to the FSA to try and sort this out.

Date: 17 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Gforce ()
Company:
Being short of a stock doesn't mean it will automatically fall. For this to happen you need incompetent management and/or poor market conditions and in Hbos/BB/BS/Lehman it certainly was the case. As you say above it's a move to distract from the real issues. There didn't seem to be any problem last year when false takeover rumours were boosting 'longs' and providing bumper bonuses for ceos. Funny that!

Date: 17 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Mondeo Man ()
Company:
If the FSA is willing to take such ridiculous action to keep the financial system afloat, just goes to show what a disastrous state we're in.

Date: 17 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Short fuse ()
Company:
What's wrong with short selling apart from that it might force the share price of a teetering bank below the price at which the tottering wreck is trying to screw more money out of shareholders. Is this such a crime? If short selling is based on the subjective analysis of factual data (ie not secret info) there's surely nothing wrong. This is how markets work - or, in the case of London, worked.

Date: 17 Jun 2008
Name/Email: barclays sucks ()
Company:
go short of barclays and get john varley and his team of cronies fired GO DIAMOND GO.

Date: 18 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Short boy ()
Company:
Whats the worst that can happen - underwriting banks get stuck with a load of unsaleable stock after the rights issue goes tits up? Oh dear.

Date: 18 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Eugenics ()
Company:
Short sellers are a blight on the market and should be put out of their misery.

Date: 18 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Horatio ()
Company:
Need to speed up the rights issue process, rather than slapping controls on short sellers.

Date: 22 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Zcar ()
Company:
What's outrageous about this particular case is that the FSA is blatantly acting in the interests of HBOS. What does it say about the viability of the UK's biggest mortgage lender if it needs the regulator to take such rash action on its behalf?

Date: 22 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Sylvester ()
Company:
This rule is bad, but the FSA's threat to limit stock lending during future rights issues is infinitely worse. It's time to depoliticise the regulator and to get it to stop poking its nose into things it frankly doesn't understand.

Date: 24 Jun 2008
Name/Email: Shorty ()
Company:
As HBOS has amply illustrated, the FSA's new rules do absolutely jack to discourage short selling. In fact, given Lansdowne shorting them, I might just do the same myself.

Email this article
Print article
Search Archive
See all articles 
 
Send us your comments or article ideas

 


Poll
The likelihood of writedowns spreading to corporate debt is:
Very, very low: 4.9%
Lowish: 26.2%
I don't know: 18.6%
Very high: 32.4%
Very, very high: 17.8%
More to say?

MORE NEWS & ADVICE:
JOB MARKET NEWS
PAY NEWS
GRADUATE / MBA NEWS
SALARY SURVEYS
ASK THE EXPERT
SECTORS EXPLAINED
ADVICE
A DAY IN THE LIFE
EMPLOYER PROFILES
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2007 Jobs at Incisive Media | Terms and conditions | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement